{"id":1429,"date":"2021-04-12T11:35:00","date_gmt":"2021-04-12T11:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/?p=1429"},"modified":"2025-02-22T13:11:13","modified_gmt":"2025-02-22T13:11:13","slug":"wf-stanley-catalogues-and-price-lists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/2021\/04\/12\/wf-stanley-catalogues-and-price-lists\/","title":{"rendered":"WF Stanley catalogues and price lists"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>From&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/2021\/03\/28\/more-wf-stanley-catalogues-online\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"27\">one of the first Stanley catalogues<\/a>&nbsp;to one of the last, the&nbsp;envelope of material&nbsp;that came with my Amsler no. 5 planimeter included a rare price list dated February 1976. This five-page typewritten document represents all that was left of Stanley&#8217;s product range after two successive acquisitions, first by Clarke &amp; Smith Industries in 1965 followed by the Sime Darby Group in 1975 (whose logo appears on the accompanying compliments slip).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Somehow the company managed to limp on until 1999 when it finally went into liquidation, but this price list is the latest source I am aware of, postdating the last full catalogue that was apparently issued in 1966 shortly after the first takeover. As such, it provides a valuable insight into the demise of the once-mighty Stanley empire, as well as a final snapshot of the analogue instruments that were to be swept aside by the technological changes already underway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"725\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1-725x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1436\" srcset=\"https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1-725x1024.jpg 725w, https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1-213x300.jpg 213w, https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1-768x1084.jpg 768w, https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1-1088x1536.jpg 1088w, https:\/\/graphography.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/stanley_1976_price_list_p1.jpg 1360w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 725px) 100vw, 725px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>By 1976, drawing instruments seem to have fallen by the wayside, leaving the product range focused on surveying equipment, drafting machines, planimeters and a handful of specialist instruments. While some of the more expensive items such as theodolites and integrators are &#8220;price on application&#8221; only, the relative cost of different instruments is revealing. For example, a 36-inch pantograph is \u00a3310, almost the same price as their top-of-the-range level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Surprisingly for 1976, two models of the Fuller cylindrical calculator are still available, priced at \u00a360 and \u00a361.25 each. Incredibly, these were both cheaper than the most basic fixed-index planimeter at \u00a362, yet today the Fuller will sell on ebay for \u00a3200+ (even in distressed condition) while the lowly Allbrit planimeter is lucky to get \u00a320.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For anyone interested in seeing the full range, the <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/stanley_1976_price_list\/mode\/2up\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">complete price list<\/a>\u00a0has now been uploaded to the\u00a0Internet Archive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From&nbsp;one of the first Stanley catalogues&nbsp;to one of the last, the&nbsp;envelope of material&nbsp;that came with my Amsler no. 5 planimeter included a rare price list dated February 1976. This five-page typewritten document represents all that was left of Stanley&#8217;s product range after two successive acquisitions, first by Clarke &amp; Smith Industries in 1965 followed by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1435,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry","has-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1429"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1437,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1429\/revisions\/1437"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/graphography.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}